Policy Brief
Decrease Out-of-Pocket Child Care Costs for Families
According to the US Department of Health and Human Services, out-of-pocket expenses for child care should be no more than 7% of a family’s income. For example, a family with a household income of $60,000/year should not spend more than $4,200/year on child care costs.
Background
A recent report from Child Care Aware of America states that a family in Alaska with two working parents will pay about 11% of their income in child care costs for one child. This percentage increases to 32% for single-parent families. Child care expenses for two children under the age of five rival the cost of housing for most Alaskan families.
While the cost of child care is high in Alaska, the out-of-pocket expenses, even for families receiving a child care subsidy, are some of the highest in the country. Research from Prenatal-to-Three Policy Impact Center indicates that Alaskan families pay some of the country’s highest out-of-pocket rates for child care.
A combination of strategies is needed to decrease out-of-pocket expenses for both subsidy and non-subsidy families while not unintentionally increasing providers’ financial burden. These strategies include increasing provider reimbursement rates to reflect the actual cost of care, reducing co-pays and other required costs paid by families receiving a subsidy, and exploring innovative solutions to reduce out-of-pocket expenses for families with incomes, placing them just outside subsidy eligibility.
Designing a more effective child care assistance program within Alaska is a critical step towards solving our state’s child care crisis and reducing the out-of-pocket child care expenses for all Alaskan families.
Policy in Action
In six states, including Louisiana, South Dakota, and Utah, families with incomes at 150% of the federal poverty limit pay no out-of-pocket expenses for child care (Child Care Subsidies – Prenatal-to-3 Policy Impact Center (pn3policy.org)).
The option to use true cost of care instead of market rate surveys for child care assistance rates has been available to states since the Child Care Development Block Grant was reauthorized in 2014 (Using Cost Modeling to Design New Solutions for Child Care | Bipartisan Policy Center). Currently, thirteen states use this option for determining provider reimbursement.
Impact
According to an analysis conducted by Prenatal-to-Three, a single parent in Alaska working full-time at a minimum wage job spends over 1/3 of their earned income on out-of-pocket child care expenses for two children, even with the child care subsidy. This enormous out-of-pocket expense leads to a higher reliance on other types of public assistance, such as nutrition assistance, lowers the economic power of the family’s earnings, and can create a disincentive to work. These outcomes are the exact opposite of the intentions behind the child care assistance program.
Adopting more effective child care assistance policies means that a single parent would have more earned income, reducing the need for additional public assistance and increasing social and economic benefits for the family and their community.
There is strong evidence that child care subsidies positively impact the well-being of children and families. Subsidizing the cost of child care allows parents to work, decreasing reliance on public assistance and increasing economic benefits to working families.
Resources
- Alaska – Prenatal-to-3 State Policy Roadmap 2022 (pn3policy.org)
- Economic Policy Institute | Family Budget Calculator (epi.org)
- CostofChildCare.org
- Catalyzing Growth: Using Data to Change Child Care – Child Care Aware® of America